Every case. Every argument.
Every document. Ready.

No. Nothing you put into Juris (documents, notes, research, or drafts) is ever used to train Juris's AI or any third‑party model. Sage reads your matter only to answer you, in that moment, and never to improve a model. Your work stays yours alone. This is enforced in the architecture, not just a policy we could quietly change.

Any AI can generate a citation that isn't real. That is exactly the risk Juris is built to catch. Every citation Sage gives you links to its source, or is clearly flagged when Sage could not verify it. You review and adopt the research as your own before relying on it, so you never unknowingly file law that does not exist.

Your data never touches another firm's data. Juris uses schema-per-tenant isolation: every firm gets a dedicated database schema. Privilege-flagged documents are filtered out in the database query, before Sage retrieves anything, so Sage cannot see a document you have flagged as privileged. Text is read from a document when it is uploaded, so flag privileged files at upload. Your data is never used to train AI and is never sold.

Your matter content is encrypted in transit and at rest, isolated per firm so it never mixes with another firm's, and never used to train AI. It is never sold, never rented, never handed to advertisers, and yours to export or delete anytime. Aligned with PIPEDA and Alberta's PIPA.

You do, completely. Everything you create in Juris (drafts, research, notes, exports) is your work product: yours to use, edit, share with co‑counsel, or take with you. Juris claims no ownership over your content or over Sage's output for your matters.

Several Canadian law societies have published guidance on using generative AI in practice. The common thread is that the lawyer stays responsible: supervise the work, check citations, and protect confidentiality. Juris's verification workflow is built around that responsibility: AI output is watermarked until you complete a documented review. The record of your review is stored and auditable.

The verification workflow is your protection. Every piece of Sage output is watermarked [Unverified] until you complete a review checklist: checking each citation against its authoritative source, tracing every factual claim to a source, and formally adopting the research as your own. The law has always required this standard of professional diligence. Juris makes it documented and auditable.

Your data is yours. You can export a complete copy of your case files, documents, and notes yourself at any time from Settings → Data, so you're never locked in. If your trial ends or you cancel, your data is kept safe and stays exportable; you'll just need an active plan to keep using Juris. We only permanently delete accounts after about 10 years of inactivity (with email warnings first), roughly the period a firm is required to retain client files, and we give at least 30 days' notice before any service discontinuation.

Juris is built to align with PIPEDA and Alberta PIPA from the start. We collect only the data we need, every AI service that handles your documents is disclosed in our Privacy Policy, and you have full access, correction, and deletion rights. Our Privacy Policy details every data flow.

General-purpose AI tools have no access to authoritative legal sources, no citation verification, no privilege protection, no case file context, and no verification workflow. They will generate confident-sounding citations that do not exist. Juris was built specifically around the risks that caused Zhang v. Chen (2024 BCSC 285): automatic citation verification, privilege exclusion at the data layer, and a documented review process before any AI output leaves the platform.

Minutes. Create a matter, add your documents (upload, scan or photograph them, email them into a case, or sync a Google Drive folder), and ask Sage your first question. There's no migration project, no IT setup, and no software to install. Most lawyers run real research in their first session.

Yes. Juris is designed for the entire firm, not just the lead lawyer. Clerks and paralegals can upload documents, organise matters, and use the client portal. The AI features require a licensed professional to verify outputs, the appropriate division of responsibility. Firm plans are billed simply per lawyer, so you add seats as you grow.